Do you often notice things that other people miss? Do you find it easy to meet new people and make new friends? They like to analyse and synthesize. Pragmatist Pragmatists are keen on trying out ideas, theories and techniques to see if they work in practice. They collect data, both first hand and from others, and prefer to think about it thoroughly before coming to a conclusion.
They also postulate that people prefer different methods of learning, depending upon the situation and their experience level, thus they move between the four modes of learning, rather than being dominantly locked into one mode.
We focus a lot on learner styles, but maybe less so on trainer styles. Do you like the challenge of having a problem to solve? The learning activities can be brainstorming, problem solving, group discussion, puzzles, competitions, role-play etc Theorists: Are you enthusiastic about life? Having an experience Drawing their own conclusions theorizing Putting their theory into practice to see what happens Based on the result, the learners can then move around the cycle again, jump in any part of the cycle, and then quit when they deem them self as successful learned the task or material.
Vol 20, No 3. Likes feedback, coaching, and obvious links between the task-on-hand and a problem. Do you enjoy being the centre of attention? They tend to adopt a low profile and have a slightly distant, tolerant unruffled air about them.
Time management skills are particularly important for effective on-line study. Honey and Mumford — University of Leicester. They learn better through taking time to think about how to apply learning in reality, case studies, problem solving and discussion. Likes anything new, problem solving, and small group discussions.
However, for an alternative approach, why not consider multiple intelligences, as devised by Howard Gardener? Do you ask lots of questions? They tend to thrive on the challenge of new experiences but are bored with implementation and longer term consolidation.
Their approach to problems is consistently logical.
Experimenting with new ideas, speculations and methods to check whether they work is their mode of action. Talking with experts is normally not helpful.
How do they compare and do they predict academic performance?: Do you like to concentrate on one thing at a time? If questionnaires or other models and frameworks for that matter help to shift the conversations in organisationally beneficial and personally meaningful ways, they will have served their purpose.
They want to remain back and see encounters from various alternate points of view, gathering information and using the opportunity to work towards a suitable conclusion.
They are the sort of people who return from courses brimming with new ideas that they want to try out in practice. Do you prefer to think things out logically?
Yet the two go hand in hand together. They enjoy the here and now, and are happy to be dominated by immediate experiences. Would you rather "get on with the job" than keep talking about it? If you visit www. Do you like to try things out for yourself? Likes lectures, analogies, systems, case studies, models, and readings.
The rationale behind this is that most people have never consciously considered how they really learn.
Learning and Skills Research Centre. Their choice of learning activities includes models, statistics, stories, quotes, background information, applying concepts theoretically etc.
They enjoy observing other people in action. Their philosophy is to be cautious. They tend to act first and consider the consequences afterwards.
These learners get a kick out of the chance to comprehend the hypothesis behind the activities. Theorist Theorists adapt and integrate observations into complex but logically sound theories.Honey and Mumford learning styles were developed by Peter Honey and Alan Mumford in Their work is inspired from and built upon Kolb’s learning styles model (Leaver, ).
however, they produced their own Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) because it was found that Kolb’s LSI had low validity with managers. "Rough & ready reckoner" This questionnaire has been devised to assist trainers who appreciate the usefulness of Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles model but find their questionnaire rather cumbersome for use in a short training session.
Learning Styles Questionnaire Name: _____ This is an internationally proven tool designed by Peter Honey and Alan Mumford. There is no time limit to this questionnaire.
It will probably take you minutes. The accuracy of Learning Styles - General Descriptions Activists. Honey and Mumford: Learning Style Questionnaire Measure employees' preferred style of learning on a self directed basis "Learning to learn is your most important capability since it provides the gateway to everything else you want to develop.
Learning styles were developed by Peter Honey and Alan Mumford, To understand your particular learning style Honey and Mumford have developed a Learning Style Questionnaire [see further reading] and with this information you will be in a far better position to do three really useful things [quoting P.
Honey]. The following questionnaire has been adapted from Honey and Mumford () The Manual of Learning Styles, Maidenhead, Ardingley House. This questionnaire is designed to find out your preferred learning style(s).Download